Tails OS: what it is, whether it is legal in the UK, what it does not protect and which USB stick it needs

This guide contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, m8d.io earns from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Tails OS is an operating system made by the Tor Project that starts from a USB stick, sends all its traffic through Tor and never writes to the hard disk, so nothing is left when you shut it down. It is a 1.8 GB download, needs an 8 GB stick and runs on most PCs under ten years old.
What is Tails OS, and what is it for?
Tails is a complete operating system based on Debian that is not installed on the computer: it is installed on a USB stick and starts from it. While it runs, the computer's hard disk is not touched and everything happens in memory, which is wiped at shutdown. Its own site compares it to a tent: you carry it, pitch it anywhere and leave nothing behind. It is made by the Tor Project, a non-profit, and funded by donations from individuals and organisations such as Mozilla, DuckDuckGo, Open Tech Fund and Craig Newmark Philanthropies (tails.net/about, read on 28 September 2026).
Inside it brings the toolbox already set up, and that is half its value: Tor Browser, Thunderbird for encrypted email, the Secrets password manager, LibreOffice, OnionShare for sharing files over Tor and Metadata Cleaner. Applications are blocked if they try to reach the internet without going through Tor, so the classic mistake of a home-made setup, an app leaking traffic outside the tunnel, cannot happen here.
What it is not: a system for everyday use. It does not start on a phone, it keeps nothing except what you choose to put in the encrypted Persistent Storage, and every session starts clean. It is built for working on something sensitive for a set time, by anyone with a serious reason not to leave a trace on a computer that is not theirs.
The promise that circulates online is total anonymity. The one Tails makes on its own warnings page is much more precise, and it is the one to understand before installing it.
m8d rule: Tails hides you inside the crowd of Tails users, not outside it. If the problem is that nobody should know you use Tor, the tool you need is a Tor bridge, and Tails supports them.
Tails compatibility checker: will your computer start Tails, and how many USB sticks do you need?
Tails compatibility checker for your computer
What stops most people who try Tails is not understanding it: it is that it does not start. The requirements that decide it are published, and three of them your browser already knows. This check from m8d.io reads the processor type, the bits and the memory, asks what it cannot read and answers before you download 1.8 GB and wipe a USB stick. The most common case, already worked out: a PC under ten years old with an x86-64 processor and no dedicated graphics starts Tails, and with the Persistent Storage you need two sticks of the same size, which is the Kingston pair it shows underneath.
- Processornot published
- Memorynot published
- Systemyou choose it below
Your browser does not publish this data, which is normal in Firefox and Safari. Answer the three questions below and you get the same answer.
It meets the requirements Tails publishes: an x86-64 processor, enough memory and a computer within the ten-year window. What is left to check is not the computer but the USB stick: 8 GB at least, and its quality decides whether the system feels comfortable or painful.

The requirements are the ones Tails publishes on its system requirements page and its known issues list, read on 28 September 2026: an x86-64 processor, 3 GB of memory to work smoothly, a computer under ten years old, no Macs with an Apple chip and no phones, tablets or Raspberry Pi, and a warning about Nvidia and AMD Radeon graphics cards. Your browser reads the architecture, the bits and the memory with navigator.userAgentData and navigator.deviceMemory, which Firefox and Safari do not publish.
Is Tails OS legal in the UK? What UK law does say about its encrypted storage
Tails is free software with its source code published, downloaded from its own site without an account and made by the Tor Project, a non-profit. We have found no UK law that makes using it an offence in itself: what you do inside it answers to the same rules as outside it, as with any browser.
The UK detail that most guides leave out concerns the encrypted Persistent Storage. Part III of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 lets an authorised officer serve a notice under section 49 requiring you to make protected information intelligible or to hand over the key. Under section 53, knowingly failing to comply is an offence with a maximum of two years in prison, or five years in a national security or child indecency case (legislation.gov.uk, sections 49 and 53, read on 28 September 2026). Encryption protects your files from whoever finds the stick; it does not put them outside the law.
What does change is visibility, not legality. Tails' own documentation warns that parental controls, broadband providers and countries with heavy censorship can identify and block connections to Tor that do not use bridges.
Is Tails OS traceable? The ways its own documentation says your identity can leak
Tails cannot be traced the way an ordinary computer can, because it does not leave the history, the files you opened, the passwords or the list of Wi-Fi networks you joined. But its warnings page lists by name where identity escapes, and it is worth reading in full before any forum.
Three of those routes do not depend on Tails and cannot be fixed inside it. The first is metadata: a photo carries where it was taken and the camera's model and serial number, and an office document carries its author and its changes. Tails includes Metadata Cleaner for this, and its documentation is candid about the limit: it is impossible to remove all metadata reliably from complex formats, because a Word document can contain embedded images with their own metadata, so it recommends saving in simpler formats such as plain .txt, and suggests Dangerzone for documents other people send you (tails.net/doc/sensitive_documents/metadata, 28 September 2026). The second is using one session for two things: if you log into two accounts on the same website in one session, the site can tell they belong to the same person because they share a Tor circuit; the advice is to restart Tails between activities, and to use a different stick for each area of your life. The third is the exit node: the last Tor relay makes the real connection to the destination, and if that connection is not HTTPS it can watch the traffic.
And there is a fourth, the most uncomfortable: Tails runs safely on a computer with a virus, but it cannot always protect you if you install it from an infected computer, or run it on a machine with compromised BIOS, firmware or hardware. No operating system stops a physical keylogger.
- It does not hide that you use Tor. Your broadband provider sees the connection to the network, though not where you go; covering that takes a Tor bridge.
- It does not clean what you put in. The metadata of a photo or document travels with it until you strip it with the tool Tails includes, and complex formats cannot be cleaned completely.
- It does not separate your activities if you do not. Two accounts on the same site in the same session are one person to that site.
- It does not encrypt the last leg. If the destination is not HTTPS, the exit node sees the traffic. Tails and NordVPN say it in the same words.
- It does not fix the hardware. With compromised BIOS, firmware or keyboard, no operating system saves you.
- It does not work on a phone. Nor on tablets, a Raspberry Pi or Macs with an Apple chip.
Do you need a VPN if you use Tails? Its FAQ says Tails does not work with VPNs
It is one of the first questions people ask about Tails, and the project answers it directly: Tails does not currently work with VPNs (tails.net/support/faq, read on 28 September 2026). Its reasoning is that Tor gives anonymity because no single point in the network knows both the origin and the destination of a connection, whereas a VPN provider can see both where you connect from and where you connect to.
The same FAQ also lists where a VPN has clear advantages over Tor when strong anonymity is not needed: reaching websites that block Tor or only open from one country, video calls, private company networks and browsing faster. That is most of the day for most people, and it is the part Tails does not cover, because it does not start on a phone and is not a system to live in. For that other job, a VPN protects your whole connection from the network you are on and from your broadband provider, and it works on the phone. It does not give anonymity: it changes who sees your traffic.
There is a bridge between the two that is not our marketing: NordVPN's Onion Over VPN servers route traffic through the Onion network after the encrypted connection, and its own page explains that this makes Tor Browser unnecessary for reaching onion sites. If you want onion sites without setting anything up, that is the short route; if you want a session that leaves no trace on the computer, the route is still Tails.

If what you want is not an isolated session but for your broadband provider to stop seeing what you connect to every day, on your phone too, we recommend starting here: its Onion Over VPN servers are also the route to the Onion network without changing browser, as its own page explains.
View ›
The option for someone coming from Tails for everyday privacy who does not want another bill: its free plan does not cap data, the condition most free VPNs do not meet. In exchange, one device.
View ›Which USB stick does Tails need? What its documentation asks for, including where to buy it
Tails is free. The only thing to buy is the stick, and its documentation is unusually specific about it, with a section of its own and a sentence worth reading slowly: the quality of your USB stick is crucial, because a bad one will be slower and more likely to corrupt the files in your Persistent Storage.
The requirements fit on one line: 8 GB minimum, a new stick, from a well-known brand (it names Kingston, Samsung and SanDisk) and ideally USB 3.0 or later, because USB 2.0 tops out at around 50 MB/s read on a stick and USB 3.0 at around 500. It adds a sum almost nobody does: if you will use the Persistent Storage, buy two of the same size, a primary and its cloned backup, and ideally a smaller, cheaper third one for manual upgrades. And a practical check: you can compare the write speed of your sticks by timing how long each takes to clone Tails.
The last piece of advice goes against convenience, so here it is in full: Tails says to buy your sticks from a reputable local store, and to avoid buying USB sticks online or using sticks that were given to you, because they could contain malware (tails.net/doc/about/requirements, read on 28 September 2026). If you order one online anyway, our advice is to pick one of the brands it names, sold and shipped by the retailer itself rather than a marketplace seller, and to make it the stick you install onto, never one you plug in elsewhere first.
| Stick | Capacity | Connection | Speed its maker publishes | Which Tails case | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64GB × 2 | USB 3.2 Gen 1 | None. Its datasheet only gives the standard | With Persistent Storage: primary and backup | View › | |
| 64GB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 | Read speed only; no write figure | One stick, no backup, low profile | View › | |
| 128GB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 | Up to 400MB/s read at this capacity; no write figure | Large Persistent Storage, metal casing | View › |
Capacities, connection and speeds come from each maker's own datasheet or product page, read on 28 September 2026: Kingston's DataTraveler Exodia M datasheet in English and SanDisk's Ultra Fit and Ultra Luxe pages.
USB 3.2 Gen 1 is the plug, not the speed: which figure a USB stick maker really publishes
Tails warns that a bad stick is slower and more likely to corrupt the Persistent Storage, so speed stops being a detail and becomes the criterion. The trouble is that the figure that decides it is rarely published, and the one that is does not mean what it seems.
m8d rule: On a USB stick, the big number is the read speed and it changes with capacity, so the same model is sold with different figures. The write speed, the one that decides how long an install takes, is rarely published as a figure at all: it is published as a comparison with a stick from fifteen years ago.
The three USB sticks of the m8d pick for Tails, and who each one is for

Kingston DataTraveler Exodia M, pack of two 64GB view ›
This is the one we would buy, and not because of the price: it is the only one of the three that brings in one box what Tails asks for when you use the Persistent Storage, two sticks of the same size, a primary and its cloned backup. Kingston is also one of the three brands the documentation names.
- Two sticks of the same size is the exact requirement. The Tails requirements page tells anyone using the Persistent Storage to buy two, the second of the same size so the first can be cloned onto it, Persistent Storage included (tails.net/doc/about/requirements, read on 28 September 2026). Buying the pack is buying that.
- Kingston is one of the three brands Tails names, with Samsung and SanDisk, and the page's reason is that generic brands are more likely to be slower and less reliable.
- Its English datasheet publishes no speed at all. Kingston's sheet for the DataTraveler Exodia M goes from the capacities to the warranty without a single MB/s figure: the only line is the standard, USB 3.2 Gen 1, with a footnote saying performance is based on that standard and may vary (kingston.com/datasheets/DTXM_en.pdf, 28 September 2026).
- What it does publish: a five-year warranty with free technical support, and a moving cap that protects the connector, so there is no loose lid to lose. 64GB is plenty: Tails needs 8GB at least and the download is 1.8GB.
- Two sticks of the same size, as Tails asks
- A brand the Tails documentation names
- USB 3.2 Gen 1, the standard its manual recommends
- Five-year warranty stated on its datasheet
- Its datasheet gives no speed, read or write
- Without the Persistent Storage, the second stick is spare
- The capped design sticks out more than a low-profile drive

SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB view ›
The one for someone trying Tails without the Persistent Storage who wants the stick to stay in the laptop without sticking out. Its maker publishes a speed, even if it is only the read speed.
- The speed SanDisk publishes is a read speed. Its Ultra Fit page quotes read speeds of up to 400MB/s for the 128GB to 2TB versions, and its disclosures add that figures are based on read speed unless otherwise stated (sandisk.com, read on 28 September 2026). There is no write figure, and write speed is what decides how long installing Tails and saving to the Persistent Storage take.
- Being so small, it stays plugged in, and that has a downside: a stick that lives in a laptop is a stick that travels with the laptop. Tails is designed for the opposite, to be carried separately from the computer.
- 64GB is more than enough for the system and a normal Persistent Storage: Tails needs 8GB at least and the download is 1.8GB.
- Its maker publishes a read speed
- Low-profile design: it does not stick out of the port
- A brand the Tails documentation names
- No write speed published
- Staying plugged in works against the idea of Tails
- On its own it does not cover the backup its manual recommends

SanDisk Ultra Luxe 128GB view ›
The one that makes sense for someone who will live in the Persistent Storage: documents, keys and encrypted email. Twice the capacity and a metal body with nothing to lose or snap off.
- SanDisk prints the speed by capacity, and all of it is read speed. The footnote on its Ultra Luxe page: up to 150MB/s read for 16GB to 32GB, up to 300MB/s for 64GB and up to 400MB/s from 128GB to 1TB, and for writing only a comparison, up to 15 times faster than a standard USB 2.0 drive of 4MB/s (sandisk.com, read on 28 September 2026).
- The casing is all metal, so there is no cap to lose. That is the practical difference from the other two when the stick goes back and forth in a pocket.
- Tails does not need 128GB; what you keep inside does. The system is a 1.8GB download and the documentation asks for 8GB at least: the rest is Persistent Storage.
- 128GB for a Persistent Storage with documents inside
- All-metal casing with no loose cap
- Read speed published by capacity
- No write speed published, only a comparison with USB 2.0
- Tails does not need this much capacity
- On its own it does not cover the Persistent Storage backup
Is Tails OS any good? A new release every two weeks, on purpose since September 2026
The short answer is yes, for what it does, and its most valuable part is not the anonymity: it is that the system keeps itself up to date and does not let you choose badly. But there is a fact about its rhythm that changes how anything written about it should be read.
Tails now ships a new version every two weeks, by design. Its news page says it plainly: Firefox is moving to a two-week release cadence from September, so Tor Browser and Tails are doing the same, and Tails 7.12 was the first release on that cadence (tails.net/news, read on 28 September 2026). Between 12 May and 16 September 2026 there were ten releases, from 7.7.3 to 7.13, and the gaps below show the rhythm was already close to two weeks before it became official. When the browser inside publishes a security fix, the whole operating system has to follow.
The practical consequence is twofold. Any guide, video or screenshot from three months ago describes a version that no longer exists, so step-by-step instructions age before you read them; the only instructions that are always current are the ones on tails.net. And automatic upgrades work from version 7.0 onwards, so a stick that has sat in a drawer may need a manual upgrade before it lets you in, which is what the documentation's smaller third stick is for.
How we checked this, and what is left out
Everything this page says about Tails comes from the project's own documentation, read on 28 September 2026: the about page, the system requirements and recommended USB sticks page, the warnings page, the metadata page, the FAQ, the known issues list and the release history on its news page, from which the gaps between versions are counted. The UK legal position comes from the text of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 on legislation.gov.uk.
Speeds and capacities of each stick come from its maker's datasheet or product page, not from a shop listing. What is left out, said plainly: we publish no write speed for any of these sticks, because none of their makers publishes one we can cite. The compatibility check uses what the browser allows it to read, which in Firefox and Safari is less than in Chromium-based browsers, and the memory it reports is rounded and capped at 8 GB by design. And Tails' official known issues list has specific sections on laptops from Dell, HP, Lenovo, Microsoft, Apple and System76, among others: if your machine is there, that list overrides any general check.
The ones behind the specific facts here, with the date we read them.
- tails.netLeave no trace on the computer28 September 2026: made by the Tor Project, 1.8 GB download, 8 GB stick minimum, computers under ten years old, who funds it
- tails.netSystem requirements and recommended USB sticks28 September 2026: x86-64, 3 GB of RAM, brands named, buy two, USB 3.0, avoid buying online
- tails.netWarnings: Tails is safe but not magic!28 September 2026: metadata, one purpose per session, limits of Tor, exit nodes, BIOS and firmware
- tails.netWhat is metadata?28 September 2026: Metadata Cleaner and its limits with complex formats
- tails.netFrequently asked questions28 September 2026: Tails does not currently work with VPNs
- tails.netKnown issues28 September 2026: specific hardware that fails
- tails.netNews and releases28 September 2026: two-week cadence from Tails 7.12, latest release 7.13
- legislation.gov.ukRegulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, section 5328 September 2026: failing to comply with a section 49 notice, up to two years, or five in national security and child indecency cases
- KingstonDataTraveler Exodia M datasheet28 September 2026: USB 3.2 Gen 1 with no MB/s figure, five-year warranty
- SanDiskSanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.2 flash drive28 September 2026: read speeds, no write figure
- SanDiskSanDisk Ultra Luxe USB 3.2 flash drive28 September 2026: read speed by capacity, write only as a comparison with USB 2.0
- NordVPNOnion Over VPN28 September 2026: the exit node can see unencrypted traffic if the destination is not HTTPS
- ProtonFree VPN28 September 2026: one device, no ads, no logs, no data limit
What is Tails OS for?›
Tails is an operating system based on Debian, made by the Tor Project, that starts from a USB stick, sends all its traffic through Tor and never writes to the computer's hard disk. It is for working on something sensitive for one session without leaving a trace on the machine, and it comes with Tor Browser, encrypted email, a password manager, Metadata Cleaner and OnionShare already set up.
Is Tails OS illegal in the UK?›
Not in itself: it is free software with published source code, downloaded without an account from tails.net and made by a non-profit, and we have found no UK law that makes using it an offence. One UK rule does apply to it: under sections 49 and 53 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, an authorised notice can require you to decrypt protected information, such as an encrypted Persistent Storage, and knowingly failing to comply is an offence.
Is Tails OS traceable?›
Tails leaves no history, files, passwords or Wi-Fi list on the computer. Its own documentation lists where identity can still leak: metadata in the files you share, using one session for two activities that should not be linked, a Tor exit node when the destination is not HTTPS, and a computer with compromised BIOS, firmware or hardware. Your broadband provider can also see that you connect to Tor, though not where.
Do you need a VPN if you use Tails?›
No, and you cannot add one: the Tails FAQ says Tails does not currently work with VPNs. Tor already hides the connection from any single point in the network. A VPN is useful for the rest of the day, on your usual system and your phone, but it does not give anonymity; it changes who sees your traffic.
Is Tails OS free?›
Yes. Tails is free to download and use, and the Tor Project funds it with donations. The only thing to buy is the USB stick: 8 GB minimum, new, from a well-known brand, and two of the same size if you use the Persistent Storage.
Which USB stick do I need for Tails?›
Its documentation asks for a stick of at least 8 GB, new, from a well-known brand (it names Kingston, Samsung and SanDisk) and ideally USB 3.0 or later. With the encrypted Persistent Storage it recommends two of the same size, a primary and its cloned backup, and ideally a third smaller one for manual upgrades. It also advises buying them from a reputable local store rather than online.
Does Tails work on a Mac or a phone?›
Not on Macs with an Apple chip (M1, M2 and later). Some older Intel Macs still work, although the documentation says they do not know of any Mac model that works well in Tails and can run the latest macOS. It does not work on phones, tablets or a Raspberry Pi: it needs a 64-bit x86-64 computer.
How often is Tails updated?›
Every two weeks, by design since September 2026: Firefox moved to a two-week cadence, so Tor Browser and Tails did too, starting with Tails 7.12. Automatic upgrades work from version 7.0 onwards; a stick that has not been used for a long time may need a manual upgrade.
Tails solves a very specific problem and solves it well: a session that leaves no trace on a computer that need not be yours. It is not a system to live in, it does not reach the phone and it does not make you invisible; its own documentation is the first to say so, and that candour is part of why it is worth using. The only thing to buy is the stick, and the choice is easier than it looks: we would go for the Kingston pair, because it is exactly what the manual asks for when you keep files, not because it is the cheapest.
m8d pick · the pair the Tails manual asks forKingston DataTraveler Exodia M, pack of two 64GBSee it on Amazon ›
Best free VPN in the UK: which one has no data capWhat a VPN does for the rest of the day, and what UK law says about it
Best password manager in the UKOn how many devices each free plan works, and who can decrypt your vaultComments
Be the firstNo sign-up: just a name. Every comment is reviewed before it is published.